The Battle in the War
The fake haired bastion of neoliberalism, Donald Trump, once
said, “Sometimes by losing a battle you find a new way to win the war.” I worry about this. Today, I went into my class and did the Heinz
moral dilemma test. I asked them if a
loved one was about to die in one week, and someone had the cure, but you
couldn’t afford it, what would you do? The
answers are quite often predictable: rob a bank, sell drugs, ask everyone for a
little, ask Bill Gates, do a kick starter, steal the cure, and sometimes they
say, ask real nicely. Hardly anyone
says, “I would spend whatever money I had to have the best last week with that
loved one I could. “
With Breaking Bad just ending, I
figured I might get a lot of the drug deal ones, but I had less than
normal. While I don’t watch the show, I
refuse to do it, I am glad to hear they killed him off (sorry for the spoiler). I read the many reviews about the last
episode and why it was great and why it wasn’t.
Regardless, my students quite often imagine they could easily steal the
money they would need. When we get down
to real logistics of how to make it work, how they would rob a bank, or sell
drugs, they don’t really know. My
students are pretty normal, lower middle class to upper lower class families
and they haven’t ever really lived in that world and wouldn’t have the
slightest idea how to orchestrate something like that in that short amount of
time for that much money. Like any good
inflated ego, they are sure they could do it if faced with such a thing.
I then
asked them about our government and what was happening. One person was quick to say that they want to
socialize healthcare. I asked them more
about what does that mean. What is
“socialism?” They talked about
redistribution of wealth. I mentioned to
them that about 2/3 of the cost of their schooling is covered thanks to
redistribution of wealth…mostly because we all decided that education is
important. So, socialism of healthcare. I changed the rhetoric on them and said,
should anyone die because they can’t afford healthcare? No, no, most of them mumbled. However, that is just me using rhetoric. Neither are true.
We talked
about how a bill is passed, how people voted on a president, how the Supreme
Court upheld it. Then, why do a few
people keep pushing this point? Why use
shutting down the government as a means to get your point across? What really is the point? The Senate won’t allow it, and even if they
did, Obama will veto it. The Republicans
just come out of this looking bad. Why
still do it?
The best
they could come up with was lobbying money.
I don’t know if that is true. It
isn’t about Healthcare anymore. You
know, just like gun control, I am OK with trying something out to see if it
works. The Scientific Method works. We try something, measure for success, try to
do everything we can to show where it didn’t work, and if it didn’t, we make
changes and test again. I don’t think it
is that difficult. But I must admit, I
don’t think this is what is on the table.
For me, I choose to look at what a government shutdown does. This is a battle and surely not the war. I figure these people aren’t as dumb as they
may sound. If the puppet head shell of a
person seems to move like a puppet, then they probably are. I figure they have run some numbers already
about what a government shutdown does in terms of changing perceptions of
people.
I don’t
know if this is true, or if this is only partially true, but I do know that you
don’t do something as big as shutting down the US government without having
looked at the figures to see how it changes public opinion. And it does.
Already, people are complaining about the ineptitude of the government,
and that is what they want. Their game
is to stop the government, to make us see that the government can’t run
things. However, if it was privatized it
would not be closed down right now.
Grand Canyon is losing some 2.7 million dollars of possible revenue per
day it is closed. I know Republicans are
not stupid. Do Republicans take a huge
hit because of their actions? Yes. However, they take down both parties with them. They are emperors who would fire on their own
people fighting in the battlefield, if it means killing the enemy. Puppets like Cruz and Boehner are
nothing. They can be hit with their own
arrows and die on the battlefield.
Besides, if the game is to make money, the job of congressperson doesn’t
pay that great. I don’t even think they
care about the Republican Party. They
care about money. It is that
simple. By shutting down the government,
they will gain something.
Be weary of talking too bad about
our government or thinking that a private corporation would run these things
better. I am sorry for those people who
planned expensive trips to our National Parks only to be denied, even though
the parks are still allowing oil to be drilled.
I am sorry for the people applying for Medicare who can’t get their
care, or for people applying for passports to visit loved ones in other countries
who now can’t go. I am not saying our
government is great. We need to remove
the people who don’t know how to compromise and who can’t understand how
science should help make policy. And how
we should move in the world with compassion for each other. One of my heroes in my life, Abraham Lincoln
once said in a very short speech at the end of a deadly battle, before the war
was actually won:
It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished
work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather
for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from
these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave
the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these
dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a
new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for
the people, shall not perish from the earth.
All I ask of people is to not give up. I think the Affordable Healthcare Act is a compromised
piece of shit law, but it is something that is trying. It is an attempt and a start towards fixing
something that needs to be fixed. Our
corporations are polluting the environment, cancer is on the rise, and if the
corporations won’t clean up their mess, the government must. And if the corporations won’t give us
healthcare, all of us fair and equal healthcare, then our government
should. I don’t know if I would pass the
Heinz test for morality or how I would react if I watched a loved one die from
something that could be cured, but I do know that it shouldn’t happen. I know people have watched friends and family
die from a lack of proper healthcare. If
they haven’t died, they were unbearably saddled with debt. I don’t think you should get rich off of the
misery of other people. From those “honored
dead” we should take up “increased devotion” and fight for each other. We are in this together. I may not have a cure for cancer, but if I
did, I would freely give it to anyone who asked. The disease from which we suffer in the US is
greed. The cure for this is to come
together, to greet your neighbor, and to help each other. You can call it socialism, but I call it
being human.
With you.
ReplyDeleteNate, Glad to see you engaging students on these current issues. The only thing I'd add is that unfortunately there are few negative implications for politicians who perpetrate the government shutdown. They come from gerrymandered districts with supermajority votes that make them impervious to being voted out for malfeasance. Ironically, many of the Tea Party types come from red states who receive more in govt funding than they give in taxes so I wonder how long it'll take them to realize this and come to terms with the ramifications.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Nate.
ReplyDelete